{ "lang": { "code": "en", "toggle_label": "ES", "toggle_aria": "Switch to Spanish" }, "nav": { "services": "Services", "see_pricing": "See Pricing", "pricing": "Pricing", "about": "About", "login": "Login", "cta": "Book a Call", "logo_aria": "Vantx — Home", "skip_link": "Skip to content" }, "credibility": { "summary": "10+ years in performance engineering and SRE. 100% open-source stack — k6, Grafana, OpenTelemetry. Everything we build is yours." }, "footer": { "tagline": "Managed performance engineering, at startup speed.", "services_heading": "Services", "observability": "Observability as a Service", "performance": "Performance as a Service", "sre": "Fractional SRE", "qa": "Fractional QA Tech Lead", "company_heading": "Company", "mission": "Mission & Values", "company_heading": "Company", "about": "About", "privacy": "Privacy Policy", "terms": "Terms of Service", "copyright": "© 2026 Vantx Engineering" }, "hero": { "pill": "Performance & SRE, on demand", "headline": "Your systems are slow.\nYour team doesn't know why.", "headline_accent": "We do.", "subheadline": "Your external performance and SRE team. We run monitoring, load testing, and observability — so your engineers focus on shipping.", "cta_primary": "Book a Call", "cta_secondary": "Explore Services" }, "pain": { "heading": "Does this sound familiar?", "cards": [ { "title": "Alerts firing at 3 AM", "body": "Your on-call rotation is exhausted and alerts are noise — no one knows which ones actually matter." }, { "title": "Load tests that don't exist", "body": "You find out about performance bottlenecks in production, from customers, at the worst possible moment." }, { "title": "No SRE, no budget for one", "body": "A senior SRE costs $150K+/yr. You need the expertise without the full-time hire." }, { "title": "Every release is a guess", "body": "Deploys go out without any baseline — you don't know if today's release made things better or worse." } ] }, "services": { "heading": "What we deliver", "waitlist_prefix": "Also available:", "see_all": "See all services \u2192", "onetime_or": "Or start with", "perf_checkup": { "name": "Performance Checkup", "desc": "5-day assessment: capacity baseline, load test, performance audit, and a prioritized action plan.", "price": "$2,995", "price_suffix": "one-time", "cta": "Start with a Checkup" }, "observability": { "tag": "Observability as a Service", "short_desc": "Diagnose any incident in 30 seconds. Alerts your team trusts, dashboards that answer questions, telemetry bill reduced 30–50%.", "price": "$6,995", "price_period": "/month" }, "performance": { "tag": "Performance as a Service", "headline": "Know your limits before your users do.", "description": "Continuous load testing, synthetic monitoring 24/7, and monthly capacity planning. Real data every week — not a one-off test before a release.", "features": [ "Measured capacity baseline (Max TPS, breakpoint, p95)", "Uptime + synthetic monitoring 24/7", "Monthly load test + capacity planning report" ], "price": "$5,995", "price_period": "/month" }, "sre": { "tag": "Fractional SRE", "short_desc": "Senior SRE embedded in your team. Incident command, post-mortems, reliability roadmap — $150K expertise at a flat monthly rate.", "price_prefix": "From", "price": "$7,995", "price_period": "/month" }, "qa": { "tag": "Fractional QA Tech Lead", "short_desc": "Your team ships fast — now make it safe. Test strategy, automation framework, CI/CD gates, and mentoring.", "price_prefix": "From", "price": "$6,995", "price_period": "/month" } }, "compare": { "heading": "Vantx vs. hiring full-time", "subheading": "The expertise without the overhead.", "col_aspect": "Aspect", "col_hiring": "Hiring in-house", "col_vantix": "Vantx", "row_cost": "Cost", "hiring_cost": "$150K–$200K/yr + equity + benefits", "vantix_cost": "Flat monthly rate, cancel anytime", "row_time": "Time to start", "hiring_time": "3–6 months recruiting", "vantix_time": "Active in 1 week", "row_expertise": "Expertise", "hiring_expertise": "1 person, 1 skill set", "vantix_expertise": "Dedicated team: Performance, SRE, DevOps, QA, Growth, SEO", "row_risk": "Risk", "hiring_risk": "They leave, you start over", "vantix_risk": "Continuous, documented, fully transferable knowledge", "caption": "Comparison of hiring in-house vs. Vantx" }, "faq": { "heading": "Common Questions", "cta_text": "Still have questions?", "cta_link": "Email us — we reply the same day", "items": [ { "q": "How does the subscription work?", "a": "Pick a service, subscribe, we start. Flat monthly rate. No hourly tracking, no surprise invoices. Pause or cancel anytime." }, { "q": "Is there a long-term contract?", "a": "No. Month-to-month. Cancel anytime. No lock-in, no exit fees." }, { "q": "How fast do you start delivering?", "a": "Most services are activated within the first week. Ongoing deliverables follow a clear weekly and monthly cadence." }, { "q": "Who works on my systems?", "a": "A dedicated team of senior specialists in performance, SRE, DevOps, and QA — augmented by AI agents. Not outsourced, not rotated." }, { "q": "How do we communicate?", "a": "100% async by default. Slack for questions, Loom for walkthroughs, PDF for reports. Video calls only when they add real value." } ] }, "perf_faq": { "heading": "Performance Questions", "items": [ { "q": "Do you need access to our production environment?", "a": "For load testing, we only need a target URL and agreed-upon test parameters. For synthetic monitoring, we hit your public endpoints externally. No production access, no SSH keys, no credentials." }, { "q": "Will load tests affect our production traffic?", "a": "We always test against staging or a dedicated environment first. For production load tests, we coordinate timing with your team and ramp traffic gradually. You approve every test before it runs." }, { "q": "What tools do you use?", "a": "k6 for load testing, Grafana for dashboards, Playwright for synthetic monitoring, Lighthouse CI for web performance. All open-source. If you cancel, every script, dashboard, and config stays with you." }, { "q": "Can I start with the one-time Performance Checkup instead?", "a": "Yes. The Checkup is a standalone 5-day engagement: capacity baseline, load test, performance audit, and an action plan. Many clients start here and upgrade to the subscription after seeing the first report." } ] }, "cta_section": { "heading": "Ready to stop guessing?", "subheading": "Book a 15-minute call — we'll review your architecture and show you exactly where it breaks under load.", "sub_performance": "Book a 15-minute call. We'll show you your system's real capacity and exactly where it breaks under load.", "sub_observability": "Book a 15-minute call. We'll review your monitoring stack and show you what's missing.", "sub_sre": "Book a 15-minute call. We'll map your top reliability risks and show you what to fix first.", "sub_qa": "Book a 15-minute call. We'll assess your test coverage and show you the gaps that matter most.", "sub_mission": "Book a 15-minute call. We'll review your setup and show you exactly what we'd improve first.", "cta_primary": "Get Started", "cta_join": "Start Today", "cta_secondary": "Book a Call", "latam_headline": "Company or startup in Latin America or Spain?", "latam_desc": "We adapt pricing to your region. Book a call and ask about your discount.", "latam_cta": "Ask About Your Discount" }, "welcome": { "meta_title": "Welcome to Vantx", "pill": "You're in", "headline": "Welcome to Vantx.", "subtitle": "You made the right call.", "subheadline": "Your payment is confirmed. Here's what happens next.", "step1_title": "Mutual NDA", "step1_body": "We send a mutual NDA within 24 hours. Protects your systems and data before we access anything.", "step2_title": "Onboarding questionnaire", "step2_body": "A brief form about your stack, monitoring tools, and priorities — so we arrive prepared.", "step3_title": "Kickoff call", "step3_body": "15-minute call to review your stack, define priorities, and align on first deliverables.", "step4_title": "First results in 5 days", "step4_body": "Expect your first capacity baseline, dashboards, or audit within the first week.", "cta_text": "Want to schedule the kickoff now?", "cta": "Schedule Kickoff Call", "cta_email": "Email us" }, "obs_page": { "meta_title": "Observability as a Service — Vantx", "meta_description": "Managed observability: instrumentation, dashboards, SLOs, and alert tuning as a continuously improving capability. From chaotic to reliable.", "hero": { "pill": "Observability as a Service", "headline": "Your next incident, diagnosed in 30 seconds.", "headline_accent": " Not discovered by a user.", "subheadline": "Alerts your team ignores. Dashboards that don’t answer incident questions. A telemetry bill that keeps growing. We don’t sell you a tool. We run your observability — and stay to make sure it actually works." }, "problem": { "body": "Most monitoring stacks are ‘implemented’ — and completely useless during an actual incident. Alerts no one trusts, so they get ignored. Dashboards that don’t answer the questions you need under pressure. A telemetry bill that grows every month with no one knowing why. And the team assumes someone else will fix it — until users start complaining." }, "deliverables": { "heading": "What our clients receive", "intro": "Five concrete deliverables. One outcome: your team knows about incidents before users do.", "items": [ { "title": "Stop paying for data nobody looks at — and collect exactly what matters", "body": "We audit your current stack and define a clear telemetry strategy: which metrics drive decisions, which logs are pure noise, which traces you actually need. Then we instrument up to 5 services with OpenTelemetry. By week 3, your team knows what’s worth monitoring — and has stopped paying for what isn’t.", "badges": [ "Current stack audit", "OpenTelemetry instrumentation", "Telemetry strategy document" ], "freq": "Weeks 1-3" }, { "title": "Alerts your team trusts — and an immediate answer when the business asks ‘are we reliable?’", "body": "We define SLOs the business actually understands: ‘if checkout p95 exceeds 2 seconds, we’re losing sales.’ Then we build burn rate alerting so your team gets paged when it matters — not constantly. And when a stakeholder asks about reliability, your team has a number, not a guess.", "badges": [ "Business-aligned SLOs", "Error budget + burn rate", "Tiered alert rules + runbooks" ], "freq": "Weeks 3-4" }, { "title": "Any incident diagnosed in 30 seconds — not 30 minutes of dashboard hunting", "body": "Not 40 dashboards where no one finds anything. 10–15 dashboards built to answer one question each: which service is failing? Since when? What changed? What’s the impact? Every screen has a purpose. Your on-call uses them without thinking.", "badges": [ "10-15 Grafana dashboards", "RED + USE methodology", "Provisioning as code" ] }, { "title": "A monitoring stack that gets sharper every month — not one that quietly decays", "body": "Every month: alert review (false positives, gaps, threshold tuning), new service onboarding, dashboard adjustments based on team feedback, SLO updates if the business changed. This is the difference between a project that ends and a capability that improves.", "badges": [ "Monthly alert review", "New service onboarding", "Quarterly team workshop (2h)" ] }, { "title": "Your telemetry bill, reduced 30–50% — without losing the visibility that matters", "body": "We identify high-cardinality metrics, verbose logs no one reads, and redundant traces. We reduce volume without cutting signal. Some clients cut their Datadog or New Relic bill in half with this optimization alone — in the first month.", "badges": [ "Cardinality analysis", "Log sampling strategy", "Cost reduction roadmap" ], "freq": "Monthly" } ] }, "how": { "heading": "How it works", "steps": [ { "title": "Kick-off", "badge": "15 min video call", "body": "We understand your current stack, your pain points, your tools. If you prefer async, send a doc and we start." }, { "title": "Weeks 1-3: Baseline", "body": "Audit + OTel instrumentation + dashboards + alerts. By the end of week 3, you have a functional, opinionated observability stack." }, { "title": "Weeks 3-4: SLOs + Governance", "body": "Formal SLOs, error budget tracking, burn rate alerting. Your team knows when to prioritize reliability." }, { "title": "Month 2+: Continuous management", "body": "Monthly alert review, service onboarding, cost optimization, instrumentation improvement." }, { "title": "Every quarter: Workshop", "badge": "2h recorded", "body": "Training for your team on using dashboards, interpreting SLOs, and diagnosing incidents." } ] }, "faq": { "items": { "0": { "question": "What monitoring tools do you integrate with?", "answer": "We work with the tools you already have \u2014 Datadog, Grafana, Prometheus, New Relic, CloudWatch, and others. We configure and extend your existing stack, not replace it." }, "1": { "question": "How do you reduce our telemetry bill?", "answer": "By auditing your metric cardinality and retention policies. Most teams are storing high-resolution data they never query. We identify and prune it \u2014 typically 30\u201350% cost reduction in the first month." }, "2": { "question": "Do you replace our current monitoring setup?", "answer": "No. We build on what you have, fix what\u2019s broken, and add what\u2019s missing. Our goal is a system your team owns and understands \u2014 not a dependency on us." }, "3": { "question": "How fast can we see results?", "answer": "Dashboard and alert fixes are visible in the first week. A full observability baseline \u2014 coverage across services, SLOs defined, noise reduced \u2014 is typically in place by end of month one." } } } }, "sre_page": { "meta_title": "Fractional SRE — Vantx", "meta_description": "A dedicated fractional SRE embedded in your team. Architecture review, incident command, reliability roadmap — senior SRE expertise at startup budget.", "hero": { "pill": "Fractional SRE", "headline": "Senior SRE expertise.", "headline_accent": "Startup budget.", "subheadline": "A dedicated SRE embedded in your engineering team — handling architecture review, incident command, post-mortems, and the hands-on reliability work that never gets prioritized. All the expertise of a full-time senior SRE at a flat monthly rate." }, "problem": { "body": "A senior SRE costs $150K+/year in salary alone. Your engineering team is shipping features, not building reliability practices. Incidents drag on because no one owns the process. Post-mortems get written and filed — then the same incident happens again three months later. You need a dedicated practitioner embedded in your team, not a consultant who delivers a report and disappears." }, "deliverables": { "heading": "What our clients receive", "intro": "Five concrete deliverables that bring senior SRE capability to your team without the full-time headcount.", "items": [ { "title": "A dedicated SRE embedded in your team — one flat monthly rate", "body": "Your fractional SRE attends standups, reviews PRs for reliability impact, participates in architecture discussions, and is reachable on Slack. Not a consultant who shows up for quarterly reviews — a practitioner who knows your systems.", "badges": [ "Embedded in your workflow", "Slack access", "PR reliability reviews" ], "freq": "Ongoing" }, { "title": "Architecture review + reliability roadmap", "body": "In the first two weeks, we map your architecture, identify the top reliability risks, and produce a prioritized roadmap. Not a generic checklist — a concrete plan specific to your stack: which services are single points of failure, which have no SLOs, which incidents are preventable.", "badges": [ "Architecture risk map", "Prioritized reliability roadmap", "Quick wins identified" ], "freq": "Weeks 1-2" }, { "title": "Incident command and post-mortem facilitation", "body": "During live incidents, your fractional SRE leads the response: coordinates communication, drives the diagnosis process, and keeps the team focused. After the incident, facilitates a structured post-mortem that produces actionable follow-ups — not a document that gets filed and forgotten.", "badges": [ "Incident command", "Structured post-mortems", "Action item tracking" ] }, { "title": "Escalation path during live incidents", "body": "When something breaks, your team has a direct escalation path. We respond within 15 minutes for P1 incidents and maintain an async escalation channel for emergencies. Your on-call rotation gets backed by someone who has seen the failure mode before.", "badges": [ "P1 escalation: 15 min response", "Async escalation channel", "Incident runbooks" ], "freq": "Always-on" }, { "title": "SLO program definition and tracking", "body": "We define SLOs your business understands, instrument them correctly, and establish the error budget process. Monthly SLO reviews with the engineering team — is reliability improving? Are we spending error budget on the right things? This becomes the language between engineering and product.", "badges": [ "SLO definition workshop", "Error budget tracking", "Monthly SLO review" ] } ] }, "how": { "heading": "How it works", "steps": [ { "title": "Kick-off", "badge": "15 min video call", "body": "We understand your current architecture, recent incidents, and what reliability means for your business. Access to your stack is set up — Slack, incident tooling, monitoring." }, { "title": "Week 1: Architecture review", "body": "We map your services, identify single points of failure, review recent incidents, and audit your current on-call setup. You get a written risk assessment by end of week 1." }, { "title": "Weeks 2-3: Reliability roadmap", "body": "We build the prioritized roadmap: what to fix first, what SLOs to define, what runbooks to write. The first quick wins get implemented — things that improve reliability immediately." }, { "title": "Month 2+: Embedded SRE", "body": "Ongoing embedded work: incident response, PR reviews, SLO tracking, architecture guidance. Your team has a dedicated reliability practitioner in their corner." }, { "title": "Quarterly: Reliability review", "badge": "1h recorded", "body": "A structured review of reliability progress: SLO trends, incident frequency, error budget consumption, and roadmap for the next quarter." } ] }, "faq": { "items": { "0": { "question": "How embedded is the SRE in our team?", "answer": "As embedded as you need. We join your Slack, attend standups, and are reachable during your business hours. We\u2019re a functional team member \u2014 not a ticketing queue." }, "1": { "question": "What happens during a live incident?", "answer": "We join the incident bridge, help coordinate the response, and make sure the right people are in the room. Post-incident, we write the postmortem and track the follow-up items." }, "2": { "question": "Do you provide on-call coverage?", "answer": "On-call rotation coverage is available as an add-on. The base subscription covers business-hours availability and incident response coaching. Ask us about extended coverage during onboarding." }, "3": { "question": "What do you deliver in the first 30 days?", "answer": "A reliability baseline: documented runbooks for your top 5 failure modes, SLO targets for your critical services, and a prioritized backlog of reliability work. Most teams say week two already feels different." } } } }, "mission_page": { "meta_title": "Mission & Values — Vantx", "meta_description": "Vantx's mission: every tech team knows exactly how their system behaves under load — and has a concrete plan to improve it.", "header": { "sub": "Performance Engineering · Observability · Fractional SRE", "headline": "Reliability is a practice, not a product." }, "mission": { "label": "Mission", "heading": "That every technology team knows exactly how their system behaves under load — and has a concrete plan to improve it.", "body": "We close the gap between 'having tools' and 'using them well'. We make monitoring, testing, and observability work continuously and reliably — as a managed capability that improves every month, not as a project that ends and gets forgotten." }, "vision": { "label": "Vision", "heading": "To be the external Performance and SRE team that tech companies across the Americas turn to when they need their system to be reliable — without building an internal team of 10 people to achieve it.", "body": "In 3 years, every tech company in LATAM and the US that needs performance engineering, observability, or SRE practices should think of Vantx as the first option: faster than hiring, deeper than a tool, and more reliable than doing it alone." }, "purpose": { "label": "Purpose", "heading": "That no team has to cross their fingers before a Black Friday, a launch, or a marketing campaign. That infrastructure decisions are made with data, not hope." }, "values": { "section_label": "Values", "items": [ { "num": "01", "title": "Data, not opinions", "body": "Every number in every report comes from real tests and monitoring running 24/7. We don't say 'I think'. We say 'the data shows'. If we don't have the data, we measure before we opine." }, { "num": "02", "title": "Actions, not lists", "body": "We don't deliver generic best-practice lists. We deliver the exact SQL, the exact config, the exact change — with the expected improvement estimate. 'CREATE INDEX idx_x ON table(col1, col2)' not 'consider optimizing the database'." }, { "num": "03", "title": "Async by default", "body": "We respect our clients' time and our own. Slack for communication, Loom for explanations, PDF for reports. Meetings exist when they truly matter — not as ritual." }, { "num": "04", "title": "No lock-in", "body": "Everything we build uses open-source tools: k6, Grafana, OpenTelemetry, Prometheus. If you decide to end the service tomorrow, everything is yours. We don't create dependency — we create capability." }, { "num": "05", "title": "Knowledge transfer", "body": "Our goal is for your team to learn. Workshops, pair programming, code reviews, mentoring. A successful Vantx engagement ends when your team no longer needs us — and that is our best success story." }, { "num": "06", "title": "Continuous improvement, not projects", "body": "We don't deliver a report that gets filed away. We deliver a cycle: measure → find → prioritize → implement → validate. Every month the baseline rises. Every month the system is more reliable. That's what we sell." } ] }, "manifesto": { "label": "What we believe", "items": [ "Most teams don't lack tools. They lack someone who operates them correctly.", "A load test run once is not performance engineering. It's a checkbox.", "Alerts that get ignored are worse than no alerts — they create a false sense of security.", "The cost of an incident is always greater than the cost of preventing it.", "A dashboard that doesn't answer the question you have during an incident is decoration, not observability.", "The difference between a tester and a performance engineer is the difference between running a script and understanding the architecture.", "100% async doesn't mean 0% communication. It means efficient communication, when it matters, without wasting anyone's time.", "The best deliverable is the one that arrives without you asking for it, with the data you need, in the format you can use." ] } }, "qa_page": { "meta_title": "Fractional QA Tech Lead — Vantx", "meta_description": "A senior QA/Automation expert embedded in your team. Test strategy, automation frameworks, CI/CD integration, and mentoring — at a flat monthly rate.", "hero": { "pill": "Fractional QA Tech Lead", "headline": "Your team ships fast.", "headline_accent": " Now make it safe.", "subheadline": "A senior QA/Automation expert embedded in your team — defining test strategy, building the automation framework, integrating tests into CI/CD, and training your engineers to maintain quality autonomously. All the expertise of a full-time QA lead at a flat monthly rate." }, "problem": { "body": "Your devs test 'when there's time' — and there's never time. You have a QA team but no technical direction. Tests run locally but not in the pipeline. You want to automate but no one owns the strategy. You need a dedicated practitioner embedded in your team, not a consultant who writes a test plan and disappears." }, "deliverables": { "heading": "What our clients receive", "intro": "Five concrete deliverables that bring senior QA leadership to your team without the full-time headcount.", "items": [ { "title": "A clear picture of where your testing stands — and what to fix first", "body": "In the first week, we map your current test coverage, audit your pipeline, identify the gaps, and produce a test strategy document with quick wins. Not a generic checklist — a concrete plan specific to your stack: which flows have zero coverage, which tests are flaky, which environments are broken.", "badges": [ "Test coverage audit", "Pipeline assessment", "Test strategy document" ], "freq": "Week 1" }, { "title": "An automation framework your team can actually maintain", "body": "We build (or improve) your automation framework: Playwright, Cypress, or Selenium — whatever fits your stack. Page Object Model, test data management, fixtures, factories. Not a demo project — a production-ready framework your engineers can extend without asking for help.", "badges": [ "Playwright / Cypress / Selenium", "Page Object Model", "Test data management" ], "freq": "Weeks 2-4" }, { "title": "Tests in the pipeline — not on someone's laptop", "body": "We integrate your tests into GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins, or CircleCI. Every PR runs the test suite. Every merge to main runs the full regression. Flaky tests get quarantined. You know if a deploy is safe before it goes out — automatically.", "badges": [ "CI/CD integration", "PR-level test gates", "Flaky test quarantine" ] }, { "title": "Contract testing + visual regression — catch what unit tests miss", "body": "API contract tests with Pact so frontend and backend can't break each other silently. Visual regression with Playwright screenshots or Chromatic so UI changes are intentional, not accidental. Two layers most teams skip — and pay for in production bugs.", "badges": [ "Pact contract testing", "Visual regression", "Schema validation" ] }, { "title": "Your team learns — pair programming, code reviews, workshops", "body": "The goal is that your team maintains quality autonomously. Pair programming on test code, code reviews with testing focus, hands-on workshops. A successful engagement ends when your team no longer needs us — and that's our best success story.", "badges": [ "Pair programming", "Code reviews", "Hands-on workshops" ], "freq": "Ongoing" } ] }, "how": { "heading": "How it works", "steps": [ { "title": "Kick-off", "badge": "15 min video call", "body": "We understand your testing process, your tools, and the gaps. Access to your stack is set up — Slack, repo, CI/CD." }, { "title": "Week 1: Assessment", "body": "We map your test coverage, audit your pipeline, and produce a test strategy document with quick wins identified." }, { "title": "Weeks 2-4: Framework setup", "body": "We build the automation framework, integrate into CI/CD, and write the first critical tests. By week 4, tests run on every PR." }, { "title": "Month 2+: Embedded QA lead", "body": "Ongoing embedded work: pair programming, code reviews, mentoring, workshop delivery. Your team learns and maintains quality autonomously." }, { "title": "Quarterly: Quality review", "badge": "1h recorded", "body": "A structured review of test coverage, flaky test ratio, test execution time, and improvement roadmap for the next quarter." } ] }, "faq": { "items": { "0": { "question": "What test frameworks do you work with?", "answer": "We\u2019re framework-agnostic: Jest, Vitest, Playwright, Cypress, Pytest, RSpec. We use whatever fits your stack. If you have nothing, we\u2019ll recommend based on your language and team size." }, "1": { "question": "Do you write tests or teach our team?", "answer": "Both, in phases. We write the first layer of coverage to establish patterns and velocity \u2014 then teach your engineers the same approach so they can maintain it independently." }, "2": { "question": "How long until our team is autonomous?", "answer": "Typically 60\u201390 days to meaningful independence. We don\u2019t optimize for dependency \u2014 a team that doesn\u2019t need us after 90 days is a success story we want to tell." }, "3": { "question": "What\u2019s your coverage target?", "answer": "We don\u2019t chase a coverage percentage \u2014 we chase meaningful coverage of critical paths. A 40% coverage number that covers your checkout flow is more valuable than 90% coverage of utility functions." } } } }, "perf_page": { "meta_title": "Performance as a Service — Vantx", "meta_description": "Managed performance engineering: continuous load testing, synthetic monitoring, web performance tracking, and capacity planning. Know your limits before your users do.", "hero": { "pill": "Performance as a Service", "headline": "Your next Black Friday is not a gamble.", "headline_accent": " It's a number.", "subheadline": "We know exactly how much traffic your system handles. What its breaking point is. How it behaves under real load. And we alert you if anything changes — before your users notice." }, "problem": { "body": "Your '99.9% uptime' is an estimate. You haven't measured it. You don't know how much traffic your system handles before it degrades, or whether the last deploy made things worse. Your team can run a load test — but no one has time to do it continuously. And a one-off test before a release doesn't count." }, "deliverables": { "heading": "What our clients receive", "intro": "Six concrete deliverables. One outcome: you always know exactly how your system is performing — and what to do about it.", "items": [ { "title": "You know exactly how much your system handles — measured, not estimated", "body": "We establish a measured baseline: real capacity (Max TPS), breaking point, reference latency (p50/p95/p99), reference error rate, and real uptime measured every minute. This baseline is your starting point. Everything we do after is measured against it.", "badges": [ "Load test (baseline + stress + spike)", "Synthetic monitoring", "Uptime checks every 1 min" ], "freq": "Week 1 — then monthly" }, { "title": "Your team finds out before your users — 24/7, every minute", "body": "From day 1, your system is monitored every minute. Health checks verify it's alive. Every 5 minutes, a synthetic test runs your critical flow (e.g., login → search → pay) and measures real latency and errors. If something degrades, we know before your users — and alert you via Slack.", "badges": [ "Uptime check every 1 min", "Synthetic flow every 5 min", "Alerts → Slack" ], "freq": "Real-time" }, { "title": "If a deploy made performance worse, we know that week — not 3 months later", "body": "Every week we run Lighthouse against your critical pages. We track LCP, FID, CLS, TTI, bundle size, and Lighthouse score. If a deploy degraded your web performance, we detect it on the next scan — not 3 months later when SEO complains.", "badges": [ "Lighthouse CI headless", "Core Web Vitals trending" ], "freq": "Weekly" }, { "title": "Every month you know if you can handle 2x, 5x, 10x your traffic — with numbers", "body": "Each month we run a complete evaluation: load test (baseline + stress + spike), update the breaking point, compare against the previous month, and assess whether your system supports projected growth. If you implemented our recommended fixes, we measure the real impact.", "badges": [ "Full load test", "Capacity planning extrapolation", "Before/after delta analysis" ], "freq": "Monthly" }, { "title": "Not generic recommendations — the exact fix, with estimated impact", "body": "Every finding comes with severity (P0–P3), affected component, data-backed evidence, quantified impact, and a concrete remediation action — including the SQL, the config, or the exact change. We don't say 'consider optimizing the database.' We say 'CREATE INDEX idx_x ON settlements(merchant_id, status, created_at DESC)' — with the expected improvement.", "badges": [ "FANG-grade analysis", "USE / RED / Four Golden Signals", "ROI-prioritized roadmap" ] }, { "title": "Real-time dashboards + reports that arrive without you asking", "body": "Your team has access to Grafana dashboards — uptime, latency, error rate, and web performance updated in real time. Every Monday you get a weekly report via Slack. Every month you get a full report (PDF) with trending, findings, and recommendations. Everything async — it arrives without you asking.", "badges": [ "Grafana dashboards", "Weekly report → Slack every Monday", "Monthly report → PDF" ], "freq": "Ongoing" } ] }, "how": { "heading": "How it works", "steps": [ { "title": "Kick-off", "badge": "15 min video call", "body": "We align on priorities, understand your stack, define the endpoints and critical flows to monitor. Prefer async? Send a doc and we start." }, { "title": "Week 1: Baseline + monitoring activation", "body": "We run the first complete load test and activate uptime + synthetic monitoring 24/7. From this point, you have real data every minute." }, { "title": "Every Monday: Weekly report → Slack", "body": "Uptime, latency, errors, anomalies of the week, optimizations performed. Short format, actionable." }, { "title": "Every month: Full evaluation + report", "body": "Monthly load test + Lighthouse + capacity planning. Detailed PDF report with trending, findings, and roadmap." }, { "title": "Incidents: alert + call if needed", "badge": "same-day response", "body": "If monitoring detects degradation, we alert you via Slack with the data. If you need to talk, we schedule a 15-min call." } ] }, "faq": { "items": { "0": { "question": "What performance tools do you use?", "answer": "We use profiling tools native to your stack \u2014 flame graphs, APM traces, browser DevTools, load testing with k6 or Gatling. We optimize with your existing toolchain, not by adding new vendors." }, "1": { "question": "How do you measure impact?", "answer": "Before-and-after benchmarks on the metrics that matter: p50/p95/p99 latency, throughput, error rates, Core Web Vitals. Every optimization ships with measured proof." }, "2": { "question": "Will optimizations break existing functionality?", "answer": "We don\u2019t ship changes without validation. Every optimization goes through your existing CI pipeline and is tested under realistic load before production. Zero surprises." }, "3": { "question": "What results are realistic in the first month?", "answer": "A full performance baseline, your top 3 bottlenecks identified and fixed, and a roadmap for the next 90 days. Most teams see 30\u201360% improvement on their worst endpoints in week two." } } } }, "social_proof": { "label": "Results", "heading": "What clients say", "placeholder_quote": "Client testimonial coming soon. Reach out to learn what early clients are experiencing.", "placeholder_logo": "Client logos added as engagements close." } }